Take this photo of Prinzessin Viktoria von Preussen aka “Moretta” from the 1880s.The silhouette and neckline is unmistakeably 1880s, but the frills, sleeves and pannier skirt loops (without the shaping undergarments) show us that she is dressing in her interpretation of a Rococo costume. What I particularly like is the hair, the front curls are very late Victorian, but the height is, what we would call, Rococo 'inspired'.
Here is a dress from the 1760s, the sort of style she is imitating |
This is an 1880s evening gowns from Charles Worth, the style she might have worn to a normal evening party. |
Here's a few more period fancy dress gowns:
It seems that it's hardest for Victorians to accurately interpret pre-1800 costumes, when the corsets were more angular and petticoats more dramatic. The dead giveaway though is the Victorian curved corsets, as opposed to the straighter style used in previous decades.
Not everyone would have had family portrait galleries to use as inspiration. Here's some fashion sketches for fancy dress parties that would have been available, much like we would use fashion magazines for inspiration. They've done a pretty respectable job with the ones below.
1845 Fancy Dress Costume of 1700s |
Duchess of Devonshire from 'Fancy Dresses Described; or, What to Wear at Fancy Balls,' by Hold, Ardern, 1896 |
Dress of Tudor Period from 'Fancy Dresses Described; or, What to Wear at Fancy Balls,' by Hold, Ardern, 1896 |
Please don't think I'm criticising these costumes, if anything I'm admiring them. This is the real anthropology of costumes, an insight into how previous periods perceived other eras. We romanticise the fashions of Victorian times, who in turn also romanticised previous periods. And we are no means immune to editing period fashions to suit contemporary ideals (but that's a post for another day).
This one below is my absolute favourite: Yes that does say Marie Antoinette period: she is of course famous for her leg-o-mutton sleeves. There is a slight nod to a panier petticoat and split front skirt but apart from that there is no resemblance to anything Marie Antoinette would have worn. Perhaps there was a different Marie Antoinette who lived in 1895???
This is fascinating. I think every time suffers from an inability to divorce 'retro' from contemporary fashion sensibilities. Or is it that we want to 'sex up' past fashion to appear attractive in our own age? It's an interesting question (which I'm in no way qualified to answer!). Anyway, my favourite game is to chart the evolution of the representation of 40s fashion in film. War films from the 1960s: ooh, look at that incongruous beehive. 1980s: just really obviously 1980s' baggy shirt dresses. The noughties: over-the-top polished, highly tailored (i.e. tight) suits.
ReplyDeleteQueen Maud is imitating French Renaissance style rather than the 18th century. Queen Alexandra went as Marguerite de Valois, queen of France (1553-1615), and her daughters Maud and Victoria posed as ladies in waiting for this queen. Maud's husband came as a Danish Renaissance courtier. If you look up a photo of Maud, Victoria and Carl, you'll see they're definitely sporting the Renaissance and not Rococo style.
ReplyDelete